“Not the Time?”: Wes Moore Vetoes Maryland Reparations Commission, Sparks Backlash

On May 16, 2025, Maryland Governor Wes Moore, the state’s first Black governor and a rising Democratic star, stunned progressives and racial justice advocates alike by announcing his veto of a bill that would have established a commission to study reparations for descendants of enslaved people in Maryland.

“This is not the time for another study,” Moore said in his announcement, signaling what he called a focus on “action” over analysis. But critics say this is precisely the kind of action Maryland needed—and that Moore’s veto is a betrayal of the historical legacy he promised to uplift.

The bill, passed by the General Assembly in April, would have created a 9-member commission tasked with studying the history of slavery and systemic racism in Maryland and recommending potential forms of compensation, land restoration, and economic redress. Similar to commissions established in California and Illinois, the Maryland Reparations Commission would have laid the groundwork for formal proposals rooted in historical research and public testimony.

Moore's veto shocked many who supported the bill, including members of the Legislative Black Caucus. Delegate Wanika Fisher (D-Prince George’s), a lead sponsor of the bill, expressed deep frustration: “We’ve waited 400 years. When exactly is the right time to study reparations? This was the least we could do.”

The decision also triggered intense reactions from grassroots organizers. N’kosi Tyehimba of the Baltimore-based Restorative Futures Collective told Medium, “Wes Moore campaigned on a story of equity, racial reconciliation, and a moral awakening. Now he’s saying studying repair for state-sanctioned racial harm is somehow not a priority? That’s absurd. This is not leadership—it’s optics.”

Moore’s defenders argue that the governor is not abandoning the cause of racial equity. In his veto message, Moore pointed to existing equity-focused investments, such as his BOOST housing programs, minority business support, and criminal justice reforms. He insisted that the state already has “decades of data and documentation” on racial disparities and that another study would delay needed investments.

But opponents argue that this misses the point.

“The idea that you can skip to solutions without building a moral and legal record is naïve at best,” said Professor Jacquelyn Jackson, a legal scholar who advised California’s Reparations Task Force. “Commissions don’t just collect data—they give the public a forum, they create political will, and they shape how history is told. Moore just slammed the door on all of that.”

Indeed, it was Moore’s own personal story—chronicled in his bestselling memoirs and repeated on the campaign trail—that emphasized the need for historical reckoning. That’s why many are calling the veto not just disappointing, but hypocritical.

“This isn’t about another study,” said Tyrone Washington, a community leader in Prince George’s County. “This is about whether the Black pain that built this state is ever going to be formally acknowledged and repaired. Moore said, ‘No thanks.’”

The veto also reveals a growing tension between the symbolism of representation and the substance of governance. Moore, despite being a barrier-breaking Black executive, has shown a willingness to buck progressive orthodoxy—earlier this year he also came under fire for his support of controversial surveillance programs and charter school expansion.

Some speculate the veto is a strategic move ahead of national ambitions. Moore’s name has been floated as a possible vice-presidential or future presidential contender. Taking a more “centrist” approach could be an attempt to position himself as a pragmatic moderate who won’t be boxed in by left-wing agendas.

But if that’s the calculation, the backlash may be costly.

A number of civil rights groups are now organizing to override the veto or reintroduce the legislation in 2026. Legal observers also note that Moore’s move could complicate Maryland’s standing as a national leader on racial equity.

“It’s a sad irony,” said Professor Jackson. “The first Black governor of Maryland had the chance to lead the country in how we reckon with our past—and instead, he told us it wasn’t time yet.”

But for many descendants of enslaved Marylanders, the time has long passed.